Asset protection methodologies have been utilized for several decades by high income/high net worth individuals and families. Asset protection structures typically include a schematic of irrevocable trusts on top with layers of subsidiary entities cascading downward from the trust level. Despite the irrevocable nature of the trusts, the tax planning typically permits the income to be passed through to the primary beneficiaries’ income tax returns without being taxed at the higher effective rates imposed upon irrevocable trusts.
From the standpoint of the beneficiaries of such asset protection trusts, these asset protection structures permit these beneficiaries to maintain substantial lifestyles without having to be concerned about meeting their normal financial obligations to business creditors, particularly business creditors who have already obtained substantial judgments against these beneficiaries.
From the standpoint of the judgment creditors of the beneficiaries of such asset protection trusts, this leads to the anomaly of creditors finding that they are ostensibly stopped in their tracks with regard to collecting from their judgment debtors despite the fact that such judgment debtors have luxurious lifestyles and ready access to the benefits of an extensive array of financial and nonfinancial assets encapsulated within these asset protection structures.
The attorneys of the Rose Law Group are highly experienced in defending the interests and expectancy of the parties to asset protection trusts against adverse judgment creditors. In the same vein, the attorneys of the Rose Law Group are also highly experienced in prosecuting the rights of judgment creditors against parties to such asset protection trusts.
The potential litigation issues arising from asset protection trusts are dependent upon the unique factual matrix of each case. Each unique factual matrix triggers the need for a screen of multiple factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, (1) the timing of the creation of the asset protection trust and the sources of the property used to fund such trusts; (2) the vetting of the formation documents; (3) an analysis of whether or not the trust is being properly administered by the designated trustee(s) under the terms of the trust agreement and applicable controlling trust law; (4) an analysis of exposure to fraudulent transfer challenges and/or alter ego challenges; and (5) an analysis of subtle nuances as to control which can in certain instances undermine the defensibility of irrevocable trusts.
Asset protection litigation can lead to very complex litigation scenarios because of both the dollar amounts involved and the intention of asset protection planners to make it as difficult as possible for creditors of the settlor and the beneficiaries to invade the “safe harbors” created by such asset protection trusts. The Rose Law Group asset protection litigation team members bring extensive experience in sophisticated debtor-creditor law, trust law and asset protection law to serve the needs of clients who find themselves in the situation of having to litigate in this complex and constantly evolving area of the law.
On Our Team
In The News
Pinal Partnership Breakfast: County supervisors talk Lucid, mining, roads and more during discussion moderated by Rose Law Group Founder and President Jordan Rose
Photo via Lucid Motors By Mark Cowling | Pinal Central Electric cars are facing skepticism similar to the kind that Henry Ford argued against 100 years ago, Pinal Partnership members and guests heard Friday morning. Mike Cruz, who is beginning a new role as head of government relations for Lucid Motors, commented on the Lucid job cuts announced days previously. “Obviously they’re going through
WATCH: Shruti Gurudanti, Rose Law Group partner and director of corporate transactions, featured as panelist at Women’s Entrepreneurship Symposium event
The event in Phoenix, Arizona kicked off with a fireside chat between Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and Sally Morton, Executive Vice President & Professor, ASU Knowledge Enterprise, and was followed by a panel of experts sharing stories and tips on how to secure options
Former start-up founder charged by prosecutors for defrauding JPMorgan Chase; ‘diligence crucial,’ says Shruti Gurudanti, Rose Law Group partner, director of corporate transactions
By Ron Lieber | New York Times Charlie Javice, the 31-year-old start-up founder who JPMorgan Chase accused in a December lawsuit of lying to the bank as it prepared to acquire her company, is now facing criminal charges as well. On Tuesday, the U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York charged her with wire, bank and securities fraud. It said that